Skip to main content
· 9/4/1986

Engel v. Ernst

Citations

  • 724 P.2d 215
  • 102 Nev. 390
  • 1986 Nev. LEXIS 1567

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • parties may not act “for the purpose of evading the law of the real situs of the contract.”
  • simile, but payment of average annual billings to client over three years
  • provision requiring withdrawing partner in accounting firm to compensate firm if providing services to former clients protected legitimate business interest and was protective mechanism; professional practices must be allowed to protect the “ ‘fruits of their labor’ ”
  • average of firm’s annual fees over three years preceding partner’s withdrawal

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Per Curiam

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.