Engel v. Engel

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that “permanency” in the context of homestead protection does not mean “to forever remain in a given place of abode, eternally” but rather “to reside at that particular place for an indefinite period of time”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

• In Re Estate of Skuro
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1985-05-01· cited 13×
• LaGasse v. Aetna Insurance Company
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1968-08-07· cited 8×
• In Re Washington
  W.D. Kentucky· 1981-10-27· cited 4×
• In Re Gentry
  M.D. Florida· 2011-11-15· cited 4×
• In Re Jordan
  W.D. Kentucky· 1981-10-15
• Ago
  Florida Attorney General Reports· 1974-04-10
• Pagnozzi v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1962-05-01

Cites

1 case in this archive is cited by this case.

• Bloomfield v. City of St. Petersburg Beach
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1955-09-16· cited 32×