Engel, N. v. Ellwood City Area SD

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that when federal claims are dismissed before trial, federal courts should not separately entertain pendent state claims
• holding that supplemental jurisdiction extends to state law claims arising from the same \common nucleus of operative fact\ as federal claims
• holding that when federal claims are dismissed before trial, federal courts should not separately entertain pendent state claims
• holding that a court deciding whether to retain supplemental jurisdiction over state claims should consider “judicial economy, eonve- nience and fairness to litigants”
• holding that the district court has supplemental jurisdiction to enter final judgment on a non-federal claim only if “the entire action before the court comprises but one constitutional ‘case’ ”
• holding that “if the federal claims are dismissed before trial ... the state claims should be dismissed as well.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).