Skip to main content
· 11/2/1984

Enfield v. Hunt

Citations

  • 162 Cal. App. 3d 302
  • 208 Cal. Rptr. 584
  • 1984 Cal. App. LEXIS 2738

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “The fact that the degree of diligence required [of a patient to discover injuries] is diminished during the continuance of the [doctor-patient] relationship does not mean it is extinguished.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Woods

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.