Skip to main content
· 8/23/2004

Enervations, Inc. v. Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Company

Citations

  • 380 F.3d 1066
  • 2004 U.S. App. LEXIS 17860
  • 2004 WL 1872703

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “A district court rarely abuses its discretion in denying a motion to amend for failure to comply with [ ] a local rule.”
  • “Though ‘matters outside the pleading’ may not be considered in deciding a Rule 12 motion to dismiss, documents ‘necessarily embraced by the complaint’ are not matters outside the pleading.” (quoting BJC Health Sys. v. Columbia Cas. Co., 348 F.3d 685, 687 (8th Cir. 2003))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Loken, Bright, Dorr

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.