Energy Marketing Services, Inc. v. Homer Laughlin China Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the parties’ “motion to compel must be denied because they failed to confer with opposing counsel in an attempt to resolve the dispute before filing a non- dispositive motion”
• “It is a waste of this Court’s time and resources to adjudicate a dispute that could have been resolved by the parties themselves.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).