Energy Future Coalition v. Environmental Protection Agency

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that petitioners faced an injury in fact when they “claim that they face a regulatory impediment . . . that prevents their product from being used as a test fuel”
• that petitioners were not intended target of regulation does not preclude causation

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).