Energy Conservation Council of Pennsylvania v. Public Utility Commission

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Any decision by the [Commission] as to the environmental impact [of a public utility project] must be set against the backdrop of [the ERA].”
• “Any decision by the PUC as to the environmental impact of [high-voltage] lines must be set against the backdrop of Article I, Section 27, of the Pennsylvania Constitution.”
• “the Court should neither ‘substitute its judgment for that of the PUC when substantial evidence supports the PUC’s decision on a matter within the [PUC’s] expertise,’ nor should it indulge the process of weighing evidence and resolving conflicting testimony”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).