Ninth Circuit· 4/15/2010
Eneh v. Holder
Citations
- 601 F.3d 943
- 2010 U.S. App. LEXIS 7753
- 2010 WL 1490825
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that “a petitioner must show for purposes of CAT relief that someone—either a government official or private actor—specifically intended to torture him or her”
- explaining that “a petitioner must show for purposes of CAT relief that someone—either a government official or private actor—specifically intended to torture him or her”
- stating that when this court needs clarification in order to adequately review a BIA opinion, it is necessary to remand the case
- finding that petitioner was “not entitled to CAT relief solely on the basis that he would have inadequate access to medicine . . . if removed” to his home country
- remanding because the Board failed to “give 6 UC ENCARNACION V. BONDI reasoned consideration to [the petitioner’s] potentially dispositive testimony and documentary evidence”
- remanding where agency’s reasoning appeared to be at odds with aspects of case
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Hall, Noonan, Thomas
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
9 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Cole v. HolderNinth Circuit· 2011-09-22· cited 436×
- Delgado v. HolderNinth Circuit· 2011-08-19· cited 146×
- Istvan Szonyi v. Matthew WhitakerNinth Circuit· 2019-02-13· cited 81×
- Sylvester Owino v. Eric Holder, Jr.Ninth Circuit· 2014-11-04· cited 30×
- Souleye Abdoulaye v. Eric Holder, Jr.Seventh Circuit· 2013-08-01· cited 11×
- De Souza Silva v. BondiNinth Circuit· 2025-06-11· cited 5×
- David Flores-Vega v. William BarrNinth Circuit· 2019-08-02
- Istvan Szonyi v. William BarrNinth Circuit· 2019-11-13
- Uc Encarnacion v. BondiNinth Circuit· 2025-09-30
Cites
14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Wakkary v. HolderNinth Circuit· 2009-03-10· cited 1,426×
- Navaratwam Kamalthas v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceNinth Circuit· 2001-06-05· cited 786×
- Li Chen Zheng, AKA Zheng Li Chen v. John Ashcroft, Attorney GeneralNinth Circuit· 2003-06-18· cited 500×
- Ukashu Nuru, AKA Ukasha Nuru v. Alberto R. Gonzales, Attorney GeneralNinth Circuit· 2005-04-21· cited 461×
- Masoud Hosseini v. Alberto R. Gonzales, Attorney GeneralNinth Circuit· 2006-12-28· cited 259×
- Nancy Arabillas Morales v. Alberto R. Gonzales, Attorney GeneralNinth Circuit· 2007-01-03· cited 137×
- Villegas v. MukaseyNinth Circuit· 2008-04-23· cited 107×
- Jean-Pierre v. U.S. Attorney GeneralEleventh Circuit· 2007-09-19· cited 88×
- Lemus-Galvan v. MukaseyNinth Circuit· 2008-03-11· cited 70×
- Dinko Ivanov Mihalev v. John Ashcroft, Attorney GeneralNinth Circuit· 2004-11-09· cited 67×
- Luis Franco-Rosendo Eulalia Zacarias De Franco v. Alberto R. Gonzales, Attorney GeneralNinth Circuit· 2006-07-18· cited 56×
- Bosede v. MukaseySeventh Circuit· 2008-01-14· cited 37×
- Garcia Gomez v. GonzalesNinth Circuit· 2007-08-21· cited 26×
- Surender Jeet Singh v. John Ashcroft, Attorney GeneralNinth Circuit· 2004-12-23· cited 25×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.