Skip to main content
· 9/30/2005

Enea v. Superior Court

Citations

  • 34 Cal. Rptr. 3d 513
  • 132 Cal. App. 4th 1559
  • 2005 Daily Journal DAR 11892
  • 2005 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 8767
  • 2005 Cal. App. LEXIS 1546

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the list is “comprehensive, but not exhaustive” (quotation and emphasis omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Rushing

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.