Endo v. Albertine

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding pro se plaintiff could not defeat a motion to dismiss by raising new allegations in his response and directing plaintiff to request leave to amend his complaint under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 15(a) if he wished to raise those allegations
• “Additional factual allegations contained in a response brief are not considered on a motion to dismiss.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).