Endicott v. Nissan Motor Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• where the plaintiff’s operation of his car “was the overriding cause of the serious accident” that injured him, no expert could testify that the rupture of his seatbelt contributed to his injuries

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).