Endicott Johnson Corporation, Plaintiff-Appellee-Cross-Appellant v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Company, Defendant-Appellant-Cross-Appellee

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• deciding case prior to New Jersey’s adoption of continuous trigger and pro-rate allocation doctrines
• absent “exceptional circumstances, each party is responsible for knowing the pertinent procedural rules and principles and for taking such steps as are needed to protect its own interests.”
• “Nor is [a district court] authorized to grant a motion that was filed beyond the 30-day extension period”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).