Alaska Supreme Court· 10/14/2005
Enders v. Parker
Citations
- 125 P.3d 1027
- 2005 Alas. LEXIS 143
- 2005 WL 2620219
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that because Rule 11 sanctions are not mandatory, trial court did not err in failing to impose them even where trial court made finding that party to be sanctioned lacked good faith
- emphasizing that a trial court’s decision to impose or not impose sanctions is “subject to review only for abuse of discretion”
- emphasizing that a trial court’s decision to impose or not impose sanctions is “subject to review only for abuse of discretion”
- explaining that where we remanded for specific findings on a particular issue, “[t]he superior court . . . had discretion to decide whether to conduct an evidentiary hearing or accept additional evidence”
- emphasizing that trial court’s decision whether to impose sanctions is “subject to review only for abuse of discretion” (quoting Alaska Fed. Sav. & Loan Ass’n of Juneau v. Bernhardt, 794 P.2d 579, 583 (Alaska 1990))
- describing our standard of review for “questions of law” (citing Catalina Yachts v. Pierce, 105 P.3d 125, 128 (Alaska 2005))
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Matthews, Eastaugh, Fabe, Carpeneti, Bryner
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
8 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Khalsa v. CHOSEAlaska Supreme Court· 2011-07-29· cited 31×
- Manning v. State, Dept. of Fish & GameAlaska Supreme Court· 2018-06-22· cited 7×
- Williams v. FagnaniAlaska Supreme Court· 2007-11-23· cited 5×
- Miranda T. v. State of Alaska DHSS, OCSAlaska Supreme Court· 2023-02-24· cited 5×
- Rude v. Cook Inlet Region, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court· 2014-04-11· cited 4×
- Alaska Building, Inc. v. Legislative Affairs AgencyAlaska Supreme Court· 2017-08-25· cited 4×
- Shay Hurd v. Larry E. HenleyAlaska Supreme Court· 2020-12-31· cited 2×
- M.T. (Mother) v. State of Alaska DHSS, OCSAlaska Supreme Court· 2023-02-24
Cites
42 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court· 1986-06-25· cited 135,235×
- In Re Estate of OdinealNebraska Supreme Court· 1985-06-07· cited 94×
- A.M. v. StateAlaska Supreme Court· 1997-09-12· cited 82×
- In Re Estate of WatkinsNebraska Supreme Court· 1993-06-11· cited 78×
- Luedtke v. Nabors Alaska Drilling, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court· 1992-05-29· cited 48×
- Alakayak v. British Columbia Packers, Ltd.Alaska Supreme Court· 2002-05-31· cited 46×
- Merriman v. Security Insurance Co. of HartfordFifth Circuit· 1996-12-10· cited 44×
- Hartmarx Corporation v. A. Robert Abboud, Spencer Hays, Tom James CompanySeventh Circuit· 2003-04-09· cited 44×
- In Re Estate of DanielDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2003-03-27· cited 40×
- Estate of Davis v. CookTex. App. Ct., 4th Dist. (San Antonio)· 1999-11-10· cited 38×
- Yurioff v. American Honda Motor Co.Alaska Supreme Court· 1990-11-30· cited 37×
- Keen v. RuddyAlaska Supreme Court· 1989-12-22· cited 36×
- Paskvan v. MesichAlaska Supreme Court· 1969-06-04· cited 32×
- In Re Estate of HassNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 2002-05-14· cited 30×
- Crittell v. BingoAlaska Supreme Court· 2004-01-02· cited 30×
- Matter of Estate of EliasenIdaho Supreme Court· 1983-06-23· cited 27×
- Hammond v. State, Department of Transportation & Public FacilitiesAlaska Supreme Court· 2005-02-25· cited 23×
- Alaska Wildlife Alliance v. StateAlaska Supreme Court· 2003-07-25· cited 21×
- Trimm v. DavisCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1999-03-01· cited 21×
- In Re Kraft's EstateAlaska Supreme Court· 1962-09-11· cited 19×
Other cases named Enders v. Parker
1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.