Endel & Son v. Walls
Citations
- 16 Fla. 786
Syllabus
<p>1. Where parties holding a deed executed for the purpose of securing them for money due and advances to be made, and they on delivery of the deed gave to the grantor an agreement to convey to the grantor, on payment of a sum named, the interest of the grantees is a mortgage interest; and if they have taken possession of the premises against the consent of the grantor, and without foreclosure, his proper remedy against them is at law, and not in equity, to recover the possession.</p> <p>2. The fact that complainant’s property was taken possession of by a mortgagee without foreclosure, while complainant was in custody of a committee as an adjudged lunatic, does not give him, after the restoration of his reason, a right to recover possession of his land by bill in chancery.</p>
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that since felony drug offenses fall under section 521.372, trial court erroneously relied on provisions of Family Code which required suspension or denial of juvenile’s driver’s license until his nineteenth birthday
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.