Skip to main content
· 1/27/2009

Encon Utah, LLC v. Fluor Ames Kraemer, LLC

Citations

  • 2009 UT 7
  • 210 P.3d 263
  • 622 Utah Adv. Rep. 23
  • 2009 Utah LEXIS 11
  • 2009 WL 172438

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • affirming award of prejudgment interest on lost profits for work that the plaintiff had performed under a fixed-price contract
  • “In interpreting a contract, we look for a reading that harmonizes the provisions and avoids rendering any provision meaningless.”
  • “In interpreting a contract, we look for a reading that harmonizes the provisions and avoids rendering any provision meaningless.”
  • “We . . . consider each contract provision in relation to all of the others, with a view toward giving effect to all and ignoring none.” (ellipses and internal quotation marks omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Durrant, Durham, Wilkins, Parrish, Nehring, Durrants

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.