Skip to main content
· 6/10/1997

Encinas v. Pompa

Citations

  • 939 P.2d 435
  • 189 Ariz. 157
  • 245 Ariz. Adv. Rep. 8
  • 1997 Ariz. App. LEXIS 97

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “[T]he legislature may enact procedural rules so long as they merely supplement, but do not contradict, existing court- made rules.”
  • “The function served by section 13-2314.04(H) is to regulate the method by 19 which [] substantive rights are enforced. This is the classic definition of a procedural 20 rule.”
  • “The function served by section 13-2314.04(H) is to regulate the method by 21 which [] substantive rights are enforced. This is the classic definition of a procedural 22 rule.”
  • adopting the “reasonable and workable” standard
  • adopting the \reasonable and workable\ standard

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Sult, Fidel, Patterson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.