Emrich v. Emrich

Citations

• 233 Conn. App. 324

Syllabus

The plaintiff, whose marriage to the defendant previously had been dis- solved, appealed from the judgment of the trial court granting in part her postjudgment motions for modification of alimony and for fees and costs. She claimed, inter alia, that the court failed to properly consider all of the criteria set forth in the statute (§ 46b-82) governing alimony. Held: The trial court did not abuse its discretion in granting in part the plaintiff's motions to modify alimony and for fees and costs, as the court expressly stated that it considered the factors set forth in § 46b-82 and its thorough and well reasoned decision reflected that careful consideration, and, to the extent that the court did not expressly address certain factors in its memorandum of decision, it is well settled that it was not required to do so. Argued April 15—officially released June 24, 2025