· 2/11/2005
Emr Network v. Federal Communications Commission and United States of America
Citations
- 391 F.3d 269
- 364 U.S. App. D.C. 20
- 2004 WL 2827188
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- rejecting challenge to FCC’s refusal to open a rulemaking procedure on this issue after consulting with expert advisors
- noting that one of the “strongest potential ba- ses for overturning an agency’s refusal to initiate rulemaking” is “that a significant factual predicate of a prior decision on the subject has been removed” (internal quotation marks and ellip- ses omitted)
- declining to overturn agency decision to engage in rulemaking where decision “appears to represent the sort of priority-setting in the use of agency resources that is least subject to second-guessing by courts”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Edwards, Garland, Williams
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.