Federal Case

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that where the assignment of a debt instrument was made between two closely affiliated business enterprises, both of which had been parties to the transaction upon which the suit was brought, New York’s anti-champerty statute was not implicated
• “The seizure of [the] offices and accounts was a classic act of state. It was carried out pursuant to a formal resolution issued by the Ministry of Labor, who was acting on behalf of the undisputedly sovereign Cuban government.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).