Empresa Central Mercantil De Representacoes, Ltda. v. Republic of the United States of Brazil

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that service of a subpoena duces tecum via delivery by Federal Express was proper under the Federal Rules
• holding that Rule 45(b) does not require personal service
• agreeing with the conclusion reached in Doe v. Hersemann, 155 F.R.D.630, 631 (N.D. In. 1994
• rejecting an improper service objection where the recipient “actually received the subpoena, and [] upon receipt, was able to object and timely file a motion to quash”
• rejecting non-party’s improper service argument where the non-party had actual notice of the subpoena
• “no reason to require in-hand delivery of subpoenas [duces tecum]-so long as the service is in a manner that reasonably ensures actual receipt of the subpoena by the witness.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).