Federal Case

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that we may consider unpublished decisions of a state’s intermediate appellate court
• explaining that courts “may consider unpublished state decisions, even though such opinions have no precedential value”
• noting that we may consider unpublished opinions from a state appellate court
• considering unpublished California Court of Appeal decision, despite “hav[ing] no precedential value,” as 4 “accurately represent[ing] California law”
• “[W]e may consider 22 unpublished state decisions, even though such opinions have no precedential value.”
• “Because of the derivative nature of subrogation, a subrogee insurer is subject to the same statute of limitations that would have been applicable had the insured brought suit in his or her own behalf.” (citation and quotes omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).