· 5/17/1995
Employers Insurance of Wausau, a Mutual Company v. Carol M. Browner, Administrator of the United States Environmental Protection Agency
Citations
- 52 F.3d 656
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- arguments pressed before the district court but not raised in appellant’s opening brief are forfeited even if developed in reply brief
- unauthorized agency action may be “disregard[ed] . . . as void, a nullity”
- “If a party ordered to clean up doesn’t want to spend any money, it can refuse to obey the order .... The energy that Employers Insurance devoted in its briefs to attempting to create constitutional qualms about the remedial structure of the Superfund law was misdirected.”
- describing a PRP’s options in this scenario
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Posner, Cudahy, Grant
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.