Employers' Commercial Union Insurance v. Commissioner of Insurance

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• challenge to prospective correction for past excess premiums on the ground that the payors and recipients would not be identical to those benefited or harmed by the excessive premium charges rejected
• downward adjustment of current insurance rates to distribute past excess profits
• “[W]e conclude that no unconstitutional .. . impairment of contract will be involved in an adjustment for excessive 1971 premiums, because the rates set for 1971 compulsory insurance were provisional and subject to change, and thus did not become the property of the companies”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).