Hawaii Supreme Court· 3/25/1960
Employees' Retirement System v. Ho
Citations
- 352 P.2d 861
- 44 Haw. 154
- 1960 Haw. LEXIS 64
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- examining Palgrave's Dictionary of Political Economy, Webster's New International Dictionary, and Black's Law Dictionary
- discussing United States v. Classic, 313 U.S. 299, 316 (1941)
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Tsukiyama, Marumoto, Cassidy, Wirtz, Lewis
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
13 cases in this archive cite this case.
- In Re Succession of BoyterSupreme Court of Louisiana· 2000-01-07· cited 177×
- Ocasio v. DíazSupreme Court of Puerto Rico· 1963-06-27· cited 65×
- State v. RodriguesHawaii Supreme Court· 1981-06-16· cited 45×
- United Public Workers, AFSCME, Local 646 v. YogiHawaii Supreme Court· 2002-12-06· cited 30×
- People v. ElliottSupreme Court of Colorado· 1974-08-12· cited 27×
- State Ex Rel. Amemiya v. AndersonHawaii Supreme Court· 1976-01-23· cited 26×
- Nelson v. Hawaiian Homes CommissionHawaii Supreme Court· 2012-05-09· cited 17×
- United Public Workers, AFSCME, Local 646, AFL-CIO v. YogiHawaii Supreme Court· 2002-12-06· cited 14×
- Cobb v. State by WatanabeHawaii Supreme Court· 1986-07-28· cited 12×
- In Re AnzaiHawaii Supreme Court· 1997-04-09· cited 10×
- Clarabal v. Dep't of Educ. of StateHawaii Supreme Court· 2019-08-13· cited 2×
- Cherrie v. Greater Nanticoke School DistrictLuzerne County Court of Common Pleas· 1966-09-02
- State v. Zuffante. Opinion by Recktenwald, C.J., Concurring in Part and Dissenting in Part. Dissenting Opinion by Ginoza, J. ICA s.d.o., filed 09/18/2024 [ada], 155 Haw. 95. Application for Writ of Certiorari, filed 12/23/2024. S.Ct. Order Accepting Application for Writ of Certiorari, filed 02/05/2025 [ada].Hawaii Supreme Court· 2025-09-17
Cites
40 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Gibbons v. OgdenSupreme Court· 1824-03-18· cited 2,543×
- United States v. ClassicSupreme Court· 1941-10-13· cited 2,081×
- Gangemi v. BerrySupreme Court of New Jersey· 1957-07-09· cited 161×
- Bain Peanut Co. of Tex. v. PinsonSupreme Court· 1931-02-24· cited 157×
- National Bank v. County of YanktonSupreme Court· 1880-05-10· cited 135×
- The People Ex Rel. Jackson v. . PotterNew York Court of Appeals· 1872-01-30· cited 110×
- Alabama State Bridge Corporation v. SmithSupreme Court of Alabama· 1928-03-22· cited 96×
- Boswell v. StateSupreme Court of Oklahoma· 1937-12-21· cited 81×
- State Highway Commissioner v. Detroit City ControllerMichigan Supreme Court· 1951-10-01· cited 64×
- State Ex Rel. Capitol Addition Bldg. Commission v. ConnellyNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1935-06-14· cited 63×
- Behnke v. New Jersey Highway AuthoritySupreme Court of New Jersey· 1953-05-25· cited 55×
- Inter-Island Steam Navigation Co. v. Territory of HawaiiSupreme Court· 1938-12-05· cited 47×
- City of San Antonio v. San Antonio Public Service Co.Supreme Court· 1921-04-11· cited 39×
- State Ex Rel. Bugge v. MartinWashington Supreme Court· 1951-06-25· cited 34×
- City of Tulsa v. Southwestern Bell Telephone Co.Tenth Circuit· 1935-01-26· cited 33×
- People Ex Rel. City of Chicago v. BarrettIllinois Supreme Court· 1940-02-21· cited 33×
- State ex rel. State Road Commission v. O'BrienWest Virginia Supreme Court· 1954-06-15· cited 22×
- Stone v. City of HobbsNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1950-07-05· cited 17×
- Curlin v. WetherbyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)· 1955-02-24· cited 15×
- Pilling v. City of EverettWashington Supreme Court· 1912-02-02· cited 14×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.