Skip to main content
· 7/30/2009

Employees Retirement System of Texas v. Putnam, LLC

Citations

  • 294 S.W.3d 309
  • 2009 Tex. App. LEXIS 5931
  • 2009 WL 2341873

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that we \expounded\ on Anderson \and other cases like it\ in Reata
  • explaining that we “expounded” on Anderson “and other cases like it” in Reata
  • although Texas Supreme Court decisions usually apply retrospectively, exceptions may be recognized when considerations of fairness and policy dictate prospective effect only
  • “[T]here is no fact issue to be 3 resolved.”
  • \[T]here is no fact issue to be resolved.\
  • \[T]here is no fact issue to be resolved.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Jones, Puryear, Henson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.