Empire Home Services, Inc. v. Carpet America, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that Illinois courts have allowed \competitors who are not consumers of each other’s goods and who do not have a contract with one another to sue under the Consumer Fraud Act\ and \[t]he protections of the statute are not limited to consumers\
• reversing dismissal of IUDTPA claim but striking requests for damages and an accounting
• when a dispute under the Act involves two businesses that are not consumers of each other’s products, the relevant inquiry is whether the alleged conduct involves trade practices addressed to the market generally or otherwise implicates consumer protection concerns
• when a dispute under the Act involves two businesses that are not consumers of each other's products, the relevant inquiry is whether the alleged conduct involves trade practices addressed to the market generally or otherwise implicates consumer protection concerns

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).