Skip to main content
· 8/1/2006

Empagran, S.A. v. F. Hoffman-La Roche Ltd.

Citations

  • 453 F. Supp. 2d 1
  • 66 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 21
  • 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 52946
  • 2006 WL 2612065

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • declining to exercise supplemental jurisdiction based on original jurisdiction established in other independent lawsuits with different case numbers
  • allowing supplemental jurisdiction over European antitrust claims would involve “the application of novel, complex and developing foreign law”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hogan

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.