· 2/24/2017
Emmett Reece Sandoval v. State of Indiana
Citations
- 70 N.E.3d 889
- 2017 WL 728120
- 2017 Ind. App. LEXIS 77
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “We need not address an issue that a party does not argue in its brief.”
- “We need not address an issue that a party does not argue in its brief.”
- “We need not address an issue that a party does not argue in its brief.”
- “We need not address an issue that a party does not argue in its brief.”
- trial court did not abuse its discretion when it “stay[ed] discovery pending a determination about immunity from suit,” which in that case could “be determined on the basis of the law”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Baker, Mathias, Pyle
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.