Skip to main content
· 2/24/2017

Emmett Reece Sandoval v. State of Indiana

Citations

  • 70 N.E.3d 889
  • 2017 WL 728120
  • 2017 Ind. App. LEXIS 77

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “We need not address an issue that a party does not argue in its brief.”
  • “We need not address an issue that a party does not argue in its brief.”
  • “We need not address an issue that a party does not argue in its brief.”
  • “We need not address an issue that a party does not argue in its brief.”
  • trial court did not abuse its discretion when it “stay[ed] discovery pending a determination about immunity from suit,” which in that case could “be determined on the basis of the law”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Baker, Mathias, Pyle

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.