Emmer v. Brucato

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “a return of service, which is regular on its face, is presumed valid unless clear and convincing evidence is presented to the contrary”
• querying that \if an abuse of discretion is an action no reasonable judge would take\ what would constitute a gross abuse of discretion—one \only an extremely unreasonable judge would take\
• finding that gross abuse of discretion is standard for all decisions involving default relief
• expressing confusion as to difference between \gross abuse of discretion\ and \abuse of discretion\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).