Eminence Distillery Co. v. Fremd

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding defendants’ assertion of vague potential harm insufficient to outweigh the strong presumption of access because much of the information that defendants sought to redact had already been publicly disclosed
• “The record is devoid of evidence definitely demonstrating that employees similarly situated to Plaintiff are routinely fired for comparable performance deficiencies or that Plaintiff’s conduct contravened a rule customarily leading to immediate termination.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).