Emily Joyce Collins v. William Michael Collins

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that challenge to the process provided at bail hearing would not interfere with pending criminal proceeding
• holding that Younger abstention was inappropriate where adjudication of claim concerning bail proceeding would not disrupt criminal prosecution
• holding that an “irreparable harm” was caused by the “[d]eprivation of physical liberty by detention”
• holding that Younger abstention on a bail hearing is inappropriate, as it is distinct from the 4 25-1354 criminal prosecution
• holding that Younger abstention was not appropriate where requiring state court to hold a constitutionally compliant bail hearing “would not 27 interfere with [the state prosecution]”
• finding that regardless of how the habeas challenge 22 to the bail issue were resolved, “the prosecution will move forward unimpeded”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).