Skip to main content
· 8/17/1982

Emily C. Martin v. Charles A. Lauer

Citations

  • 686 F.2d 24
  • 222 U.S. App. D.C. 302
  • 1982 U.S. App. LEXIS 16554

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “Appellants’ interest in speaking freely with their attorneys is interwoven with their right to effective assistance of counsel.”
  • “It is (a) fundamental □ common law principle that once an arbitrator has made and published a final award his authority is exhausted and he is functus officio and can do nothing more in regard to the 35, subject matter of the arbitration.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Robinson, Wald, Swygert, Seventh

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.