Emilio R. Ortiz, Sr., Claimant-Appellant v. Anthony J. Principi, Secretary of Veterans Affairs

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that \the benefit of the doubt rule is inapplicable when the preponderance of the evidence is found to be against the claimant\
• holding that \the benefit of the doubt rule is inapplicable when the preponderance of the evidence is found to be against the claimant\
• holding that \the benefit of the doubt rule is inapplicable when the preponderance of the evidence is found to be against the claimant\
• holding that \the benefit of the doubt rule is inapplicable when the preponderance of the evidence is found to be against the claimant\
• holding that \the benefit of the doubt rule is inapplicable when the preponderance of the evidence is found to be against the claimant\
• holding that \the benefit of the doubt rule is inapplicable when the preponderance of the evidence is found to be against the claimant\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).