Emil v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that district court did not abuse its discretion in admitting testimony about prior murder conviction during penalty hearing
• concluding that district court did not abuse its discretion in admitting SuPREME GouRT oF NEvaDA 10
• concluding that district court did not abuse its discretion in admitting SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA 3 (0) 1947A testimony about prior murder conviction during penalty hearing
• providing that comments invited by defense argument do not amount to prosecutorial SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA 17 (0) 1947A 44/014D misconduct

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).