Emil Andrew Castignanie v. the State of Texas

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that one who has voluntarily abandoned property cannot subsequently complain about its search and seizure
• holding that one who has voluntarily abandoned property cannot sub- sequently complain about its search and seizure
• holding that one who has voluntarily abandoned property cannot subsequently complain about its search and seizure
• holding that a search of a suitcase that could have been made at the arrest scene was allowed at a later time in the detention center
• holding that an individual has no privacy interest in abandoned property, such as items thrown away in a vacated hotel-room wastebasket
• holding that an administrative 17 No. 08-30512 inspection is a sham if it is “a pretext solely to gather evidence of criminal activity.” (emphasis added)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).