Emiabata v. Marten Transport, Ltd.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding plaintiffs’ defamation pleading was sufficient regardless of common interest privilege because they sufficiently alleged that defendant made defamatory statements to a third party
• granting motion to dismiss wrongful termination claim where complaint failed to identify a well-defined public policy
• at the motion to dismiss stage, “there is no reason [a plaintiff] would have this kind of statistical evidence yet”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).