· 5/5/2004
EMI Music Marketing v. Avatar Records, Inc.
Citations
- 317 F. Supp. 2d 412
- 2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 8076
- 2004 WL 1041511
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- finding no unfair competition where record producer alleged record distributor undermined sales, because “their relationship was symbiotic . . . [defendant’s] financial success turned at least in part on [plaintiff’s]” success, and vice versa
- directing the entry of final judgment pursuant to Rule 54(b
- directing the entry of final judgment pursuant to Rule 54(b
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Marrero
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.