Skip to main content
· 5/5/2004

EMI Music Marketing v. Avatar Records, Inc.

Citations

  • 317 F. Supp. 2d 412
  • 2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 8076
  • 2004 WL 1041511

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding no unfair competition where record producer alleged record distributor undermined sales, because “their relationship was symbiotic . . . [defendant’s] financial success turned at least in part on [plaintiff’s]” success, and vice versa
  • directing the entry of final judgment pursuant to Rule 54(b
  • directing the entry of final judgment pursuant to Rule 54(b

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Marrero

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.