Skip to main content
· 9/20/2006

EMI Mills Music, Inc. v. Empress Hotel, Inc.

Citations

  • 470 F. Supp. 2d 67
  • 82 U.S.P.Q. 2d (BNA) 1674
  • 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 94719
  • 2006 WL 3921863

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that “courts routinely compute statutory damages . . . between two to six times the license fees defendants ‘saved’ by not obeying the Copyright Act”
  • detailing the warnings that the defendants received that their conduct violated the Copyright Act and concluding that the defendants’ “public performance ... was deliberate and willful”
  • awarding $15,000.00 per work where defendants “repeatedly rejected and ignored [plaintiff’s] offerings and acted as if they were not subject to the copyright laws”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Acosta

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.