Emhart Industries, Inc. v. Home Insurance

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that “[o]f course ... the charging documents are silent with respect to whether dioxin was discoverable at the Site in 1969”
• applying Kayser-Roth for “ ‘all sums’ method,” although noting that the Rhode Island Supreme Court did not endorse this approach “in direct terms”
• “Nothing in this language limits Century’s defense obligation _”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).