Skip to main content
Federal & State Lawfederalstatelaw.com
Home/Federal/Cases
· 3/16/1891

Emery v. Svea Fire Insurance

Citations

  • 88 Cal. 300
  • 26 P. 88
  • 1891 Cal. LEXIS 690

Syllabus

<p>Fire Insurance—Action upon Policy — Performance of Conditions — Noticb of Fire and Loss — Pleading. — An allegation in the complaint in an action on a fire insurance policy, “that the plaintiffs duly performed all the conditions of the said contract of insurance on their part,” is a sufficient allegation of a notice to the company of the fire and loss, as required by the policy.</p> <p>Id.—Acceptance of Premium after Knowledge of Loss — Waiver of Notice — Estoppel. —An acceptance by the insurance company of the premium due after knowledge of the fire and loss estops the company from claiming, in an action on the policy, that the insured neglected to give the notice forthwith, as required by the policy.</p>

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • imposing Review Panel Reprimand for violations of Rules 1.3, 1.4, and 9.3 related to failure to file and misleading client communications
  • imposing Review Panel reprimand for violations of Rules 1.3, 1.4, and 9.3 related to failure to file and misleading client communications
  • Review Panel reprimand for violations of Rules 1.3, 1.4, and 9.3 by failing to file a complaint and accurately keep the client informed of the status of his case in one matter and failing to file a timely, sworn answer to the Bar’s notice of investigation of another matter
  • Review Panel reprimand for violations of Rules 1.3, 1.4, and 9.3 by failing to file a complaint and accurately keep the client informed of the status of his case in one matter and failing to file a timely, sworn answer to the Bar’s notice of investigation of another matter
  • same for attorney’s violations of Rules 1.3, 1.4, and 9.3 by failing to file a complaint and accurately keep the 4 client informed of the status of his case in one matter and failing to file a timely, sworn answer to the Bar’s notice of investigation of another matter

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Haven

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.