Skip to main content
· 7/6/1998

Emery v. Owens Corning (Corp.)

Citations

  • 721 So. 2d 912
  • 1998 La. LEXIS 2466
  • 1998 WL 676925

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • observing that rule 3.800(b) provides only “an alternative method of preserving for review an alleged sentencing error” and “was designed for use only in a direct appeal from the sentence at issue”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Knoll

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.