Emerson v. Thiel College

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that a pro se litigant waived certain claims on appeal for failure to address the claims in his briefing
• finding there was no effective alternative sanction due to the IFP Plaintiff’s financial situation
• individuals are not subject to liability under “Titles I or II of the ADA, which prohibit discrimination by employers and public entities respectively.”
• individuals are not subject to liability under “Titles I or II of the ADA, which prohibit discrimination by employers and public entities respectively.”
• individuals are not subject to liability under “Titles I or II of the ADA, which prohibit discrimination by employers and public entities respectively.”
• “Because the individual defendants do not receive federal aid, [plaintiff] does not state a claim against them under the Rehabilitation Act.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).