Skip to main content

Emerson v. State

Citations

  • 724 N.E.2d 605
  • 2000 Ind. LEXIS 184
  • 2000 WL 233321

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • observing that it is the jury’s function to resolve conflicting testimony and discrepancies between the witnesses’ original out-of-court identifications
  • holding it was reasonable for a jury to believe in-court identification testimony
  • issues Emerson raised on direct appeal included jury instruction regarding identification, in-court identification by eyewitness, sufficient evidence of identity
  • trial court did not err in rejecting instruction on eyewitness identification; general instruction on credibility of witnesses was sufficient to address the subject

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Shepard, Dickson, Sullivan, Boehm, Rucker

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

14 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

15 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.