Skip to main content
· 7/30/2009

Emerson v. Shaw

Citations

  • 575 F.3d 680
  • 2009 U.S. App. LEXIS 16815
  • 2009 WL 2253435

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “As long as the original instructions accurately and un‐ derstandably state the law, referring a jury back to those in‐ structions can be the most prudent course.”
  • affirming denial of habeas relief
  • affirming denial of habeas relief
  • affirming denial of habeas relief
  • affirming denial of habeas relief
  • affirming denial of habeas relief

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Easterbrook, Sykes, Tinder

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.