Skip to main content
· 10/9/1963

Emerson v. Royal Lumber Co.

Citations

  • 322 F.2d 1020

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • under the second prong of the plain-error doctrine, a forfeited claim that the restitution order lacked a sufficient evidentiary basis is reviewable

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.