· 10/4/1984
Emerson v. Powell
Citations
- 321 S.E.2d 629
- 283 S.C. 293
- 1984 S.C. App. LEXIS 578
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- fraud must relate to a present or preexisting fact; it cannot be based on statements as to future events
- “As a general rule..., the fraudulent representation must relate to a present or preexisting fact and it cannot ordinarily be based on unfulfilled promises or statements as to future events.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Goolsby, Sanders, Gardner
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.