Skip to main content
· 10/4/1984

Emerson v. Powell

Citations

  • 321 S.E.2d 629
  • 283 S.C. 293
  • 1984 S.C. App. LEXIS 578

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • fraud must relate to a present or preexisting fact; it cannot be based on statements as to future events
  • “As a general rule..., the fraudulent representation must relate to a present or preexisting fact and it cannot ordinarily be based on unfulfilled promises or statements as to future events.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Goolsby, Sanders, Gardner

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.