Skip to main content
· 1/7/1922

Emerson-Brantingham Implement Co. v. Biddle

Citations

  • 110 Kan. 365
  • 203 P. 725
  • 1922 Kan. LEXIS 53

Syllabus

<p>SYLLABUS BY THE COURT.</p> <p>Sale — Threshing Machine — Written Contract — Warranty—No Written Notice of Defects as Required by Warranty — No Waiver. A threshing machine was sold under the terms of a written warranty, the material parts of which are set out in the opinion. The warranty required written notice of the defects within six days from the first day of the use of the threshing machine. Verbal notice given to the manager of a branch house of the machine company’s business did not comply with the terms of the warranty, and the warranty was not waived by the company sending workmen to repair the machine, nor by the promises of such manager to make the machine satisfactory.</p>

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that the MCCA premiums are “inevitably” “passed on” to Michigan’s no-fault insurance customers

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Marshall, West

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.