EMERO S. TORNERO v. UNITED STATES

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Because a trial court has broad discretion in controlling the scope of closing argument, we review a decision to restrict such argument [for] . . . abuse of discretion.” (alteration and omission in original) (quoting Haley v. United States, 799 A.2d 1201, 1207 (D.C. 2002))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).