Skip to main content
· 2/28/2012

Emerick v. Cardiac Study Center, Inc.

Citations

  • 170 Wash. App. 248
  • 286 P.3d 689

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • clearly identified time period for expiration of agreement met informal requirement for correspondence under rule

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Armstrong, Hunt, Johanson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.